[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100105130322.006c03ee.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 13:03:22 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Quentin Barnes <qbarnes+nfs@...oo-inc.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v4] readahead: introduce O_RANDOM for
POSIX_FADV_RANDOM
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 20:56:20 +0800 Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> For now I'll use bit 040000000, which happen to equal to
> FMODE_NONOTIFY and will be masked out by __dentry_open()
> in the very beginning.
But also clashes with __O_SYNC on sparc, sorry. I am not sure how we are
meant to reasonably choose these values any more ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists