[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <12626570513455-git-send-email->
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:04:06 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/8] rcu: disable lockdep checking in RCU list-traversal primitives
From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
The theory is that use of bare rcu_dereference() is more prone to error
than use of the RCU list-traversal primitives. Therefore, disable lockdep
RCU read-side critical-section checking in these primitives for the time
being. Once all of the rcu_dereference() uses have been dealt with, it
may be time to re-enable lockdep checking for the RCU list-traversal
primitives.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rculist.h | 14 +++++++-------
include/linux/rculist_nulls.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h
index 5710f43..0d4b617 100644
--- a/include/linux/rculist.h
+++ b/include/linux/rculist.h
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
* primitives such as list_add_rcu() as long as it's guarded by rcu_read_lock().
*/
#define list_entry_rcu(ptr, type, member) \
- container_of(rcu_dereference(ptr), type, member)
+ container_of(rcu_dereference_raw(ptr), type, member)
/**
* list_first_entry_rcu - get the first element from a list
@@ -225,9 +225,9 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
list_entry_rcu((ptr)->next, type, member)
#define __list_for_each_rcu(pos, head) \
- for (pos = rcu_dereference((head)->next); \
+ for (pos = rcu_dereference_raw((head)->next); \
pos != (head); \
- pos = rcu_dereference(pos->next))
+ pos = rcu_dereference_raw(pos->next))
/**
* list_for_each_entry_rcu - iterate over rcu list of given type
@@ -257,9 +257,9 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
* as long as the traversal is guarded by rcu_read_lock().
*/
#define list_for_each_continue_rcu(pos, head) \
- for ((pos) = rcu_dereference((pos)->next); \
+ for ((pos) = rcu_dereference_raw((pos)->next); \
prefetch((pos)->next), (pos) != (head); \
- (pos) = rcu_dereference((pos)->next))
+ (pos) = rcu_dereference_raw((pos)->next))
/**
* hlist_del_rcu - deletes entry from hash list without re-initialization
@@ -404,10 +404,10 @@ static inline void hlist_add_after_rcu(struct hlist_node *prev,
* as long as the traversal is guarded by rcu_read_lock().
*/
#define hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(tpos, pos, head, member) \
- for (pos = rcu_dereference((head)->first); \
+ for (pos = rcu_dereference_raw((head)->first); \
pos && ({ prefetch(pos->next); 1; }) && \
({ tpos = hlist_entry(pos, typeof(*tpos), member); 1; }); \
- pos = rcu_dereference(pos->next))
+ pos = rcu_dereference_raw(pos->next))
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif
diff --git a/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h b/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
index 589a409..b70ffe5 100644
--- a/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
+++ b/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
@@ -101,10 +101,10 @@ static inline void hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(struct hlist_nulls_node *n,
*
*/
#define hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(tpos, pos, head, member) \
- for (pos = rcu_dereference((head)->first); \
+ for (pos = rcu_dereference_raw((head)->first); \
(!is_a_nulls(pos)) && \
({ tpos = hlist_nulls_entry(pos, typeof(*tpos), member); 1; }); \
- pos = rcu_dereference(pos->next))
+ pos = rcu_dereference_raw(pos->next))
#endif
#endif
--
1.5.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists