[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100105092836.a7feb26c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:28:36 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"minchan.kim@...il.com" <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
"hugh.dickins" <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] Speculative pagefault -v3
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:59:45 -0600 (CST)
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > Fun, but why do we need this?
> >
> > What improvements did you measure?
>
> If it measures up to Kame-sans approach then the possible pagefault rate
> will at least double ...
>
On 4-core/2 socket machine ;)
More than page fault rate, important fact is that we can reduce cache contention
by skipping mmap_sem in some situation.
And I think we have some chances.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists