[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1262672771.4512.50.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:26:11 +0200
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: xfs@....sgi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sort: Introduce generic list_sort function
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 10:54 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> There are two copies of list_sort() in the tree already, one in the DRM code,
> another in ubifs. Now XFS needs this as well. Create a generic list_sort()
> function from the ubifs version and convert existing users to it so we
> don't end up with yet another copy in the tree.
>
> CC: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
> CC: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
> CC: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 90 ++--------------------------------------
> fs/ubifs/gc.c | 95 ------------------------------------------
> include/linux/sort.h | 5 ++
> lib/sort.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 181 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> index 51f6772..3846ed4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> @@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
> /*
> - * The list_sort function is (presumably) licensed under the GPL (see the
> - * top level "COPYING" file for details).
> - *
> - * The remainder of this file is:
> - *
> * Copyright © 1997-2003 by The XFree86 Project, Inc.
> * Copyright © 2007 Dave Airlie
> * Copyright © 2007-2008 Intel Corporation
> @@ -36,6 +31,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/sort.h>
> #include "drmP.h"
> #include "drm.h"
> #include "drm_crtc.h"
> @@ -829,6 +825,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_prune_invalid);
>
> /**
> * drm_mode_compare - compare modes for favorability
> + * @priv: unused
> * @lh_a: list_head for first mode
> * @lh_b: list_head for second mode
> *
> @@ -842,7 +839,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_prune_invalid);
> * Negative if @lh_a is better than @lh_b, zero if they're equivalent, or
> * positive if @lh_b is better than @lh_a.
> */
> -static int drm_mode_compare(struct list_head *lh_a, struct list_head *lh_b)
> +static int drm_mode_compare(void *priv, struct list_head *lh_a, struct list_head *lh_b)
> {
> struct drm_display_mode *a = list_entry(lh_a, struct drm_display_mode, head);
> struct drm_display_mode *b = list_entry(lh_b, struct drm_display_mode, head);
> @@ -859,85 +856,6 @@ static int drm_mode_compare(struct list_head *lh_a, struct list_head *lh_b)
> return diff;
> }
>
> -/* FIXME: what we don't have a list sort function? */
> -/* list sort from Mark J Roberts (mjr@...x.org) */
> -void list_sort(struct list_head *head,
> - int (*cmp)(struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b))
> -{
> - struct list_head *p, *q, *e, *list, *tail, *oldhead;
> - int insize, nmerges, psize, qsize, i;
> -
> - list = head->next;
> - list_del(head);
> - insize = 1;
> - for (;;) {
> - p = oldhead = list;
> - list = tail = NULL;
> - nmerges = 0;
> -
> - while (p) {
> - nmerges++;
> - q = p;
> - psize = 0;
> - for (i = 0; i < insize; i++) {
> - psize++;
> - q = q->next == oldhead ? NULL : q->next;
> - if (!q)
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - qsize = insize;
> - while (psize > 0 || (qsize > 0 && q)) {
> - if (!psize) {
> - e = q;
> - q = q->next;
> - qsize--;
> - if (q == oldhead)
> - q = NULL;
> - } else if (!qsize || !q) {
> - e = p;
> - p = p->next;
> - psize--;
> - if (p == oldhead)
> - p = NULL;
> - } else if (cmp(p, q) <= 0) {
> - e = p;
> - p = p->next;
> - psize--;
> - if (p == oldhead)
> - p = NULL;
> - } else {
> - e = q;
> - q = q->next;
> - qsize--;
> - if (q == oldhead)
> - q = NULL;
> - }
> - if (tail)
> - tail->next = e;
> - else
> - list = e;
> - e->prev = tail;
> - tail = e;
> - }
> - p = q;
> - }
> -
> - tail->next = list;
> - list->prev = tail;
> -
> - if (nmerges <= 1)
> - break;
> -
> - insize *= 2;
> - }
> -
> - head->next = list;
> - head->prev = list->prev;
> - list->prev->next = head;
> - list->prev = head;
> -}
> -
> /**
> * drm_mode_sort - sort mode list
> * @mode_list: list to sort
> @@ -949,7 +867,7 @@ void list_sort(struct list_head *head,
> */
> void drm_mode_sort(struct list_head *mode_list)
> {
> - list_sort(mode_list, drm_mode_compare);
> + list_sort(NULL, mode_list, drm_mode_compare);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_sort);
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/gc.c b/fs/ubifs/gc.c
> index 618c270..4976e07 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/gc.c
> @@ -108,101 +108,6 @@ static int switch_gc_head(struct ubifs_info *c)
> }
>
> /**
> - * list_sort - sort a list.
> - * @priv: private data, passed to @cmp
> - * @head: the list to sort
> - * @cmp: the elements comparison function
> - *
> - * This function has been implemented by Mark J Roberts <mjr@...x.org>. It
> - * implements "merge sort" which has O(nlog(n)) complexity. The list is sorted
> - * in ascending order.
> - *
> - * The comparison function @cmp is supposed to return a negative value if @a is
> - * than @b, and a positive value if @a is greater than @b. If @a and @b are
> - * equivalent, then it does not matter what this function returns.
> - */
> -static void list_sort(void *priv, struct list_head *head,
> - int (*cmp)(void *priv, struct list_head *a,
> - struct list_head *b))
> -{
> - struct list_head *p, *q, *e, *list, *tail, *oldhead;
> - int insize, nmerges, psize, qsize, i;
> -
> - if (list_empty(head))
> - return;
> -
> - list = head->next;
> - list_del(head);
> - insize = 1;
> - for (;;) {
> - p = oldhead = list;
> - list = tail = NULL;
> - nmerges = 0;
> -
> - while (p) {
> - nmerges++;
> - q = p;
> - psize = 0;
> - for (i = 0; i < insize; i++) {
> - psize++;
> - q = q->next == oldhead ? NULL : q->next;
> - if (!q)
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - qsize = insize;
> - while (psize > 0 || (qsize > 0 && q)) {
> - if (!psize) {
> - e = q;
> - q = q->next;
> - qsize--;
> - if (q == oldhead)
> - q = NULL;
> - } else if (!qsize || !q) {
> - e = p;
> - p = p->next;
> - psize--;
> - if (p == oldhead)
> - p = NULL;
> - } else if (cmp(priv, p, q) <= 0) {
> - e = p;
> - p = p->next;
> - psize--;
> - if (p == oldhead)
> - p = NULL;
> - } else {
> - e = q;
> - q = q->next;
> - qsize--;
> - if (q == oldhead)
> - q = NULL;
> - }
> - if (tail)
> - tail->next = e;
> - else
> - list = e;
> - e->prev = tail;
> - tail = e;
> - }
> - p = q;
> - }
> -
> - tail->next = list;
> - list->prev = tail;
> -
> - if (nmerges <= 1)
> - break;
> -
> - insize *= 2;
> - }
> -
> - head->next = list;
> - head->prev = list->prev;
> - list->prev->next = head;
> - list->prev = head;
> -}
> -
> -/**
> * data_nodes_cmp - compare 2 data nodes.
> * @priv: UBIFS file-system description object
> * @a: first data node
> diff --git a/include/linux/sort.h b/include/linux/sort.h
> index d534da2..99a2ed5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sort.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sort.h
> @@ -3,8 +3,13 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> +struct list_head;
> +
> void sort(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
> int (*cmp)(const void *, const void *),
> void (*swap)(void *, void *, int));
>
> +void list_sort(void *priv, struct list_head *head,
> + int (*cmp)(void *priv, struct list_head *a,
> + struct list_head *b));
> #endif
> diff --git a/lib/sort.c b/lib/sort.c
> index 926d004..1772c45 100644
> --- a/lib/sort.c
> +++ b/lib/sort.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/sort.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
>
> static void u32_swap(void *a, void *b, int size)
> {
> @@ -121,3 +122,99 @@ static int sort_test(void)
>
> module_init(sort_test);
> #endif
> +
> +/**
> + * list_sort - sort a list.
> + * @priv: private data, passed to @cmp
> + * @head: the list to sort
> + * @cmp: the elements comparison function
> + *
> + * This function has been implemented by Mark J Roberts <mjr@...x.org>. It
> + * implements "merge sort" which has O(nlog(n)) complexity. The list is sorted
> + * in ascending order.
> + *
> + * The comparison function @cmp is supposed to return a negative value if @a is
> + * than @b, and a positive value if @a is greater than @b. If @a and @b are
While you are on it, could you also please fix the typo: "if @a is less
than @b".
> + * equivalent, then it does not matter what this function returns.
> + */
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists