[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1262680521.2400.25.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:35:21 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
"hugh.dickins" <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] mm: handle_speculative_fault()
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 15:09 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Couldn't we synchronize rcu in that cases(munmap, exit and so on)?
> It can delay munap and exit but it would be better than handling them by more
> complicated things, I think. And both cases aren't often cases so we
> can achieve advantage than disadvantage?
Sadly there are programs that mmap()/munmap() at a staggering rate
(clamav comes to mind), so munmap() performance is important too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists