[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100106011138.2743dad2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:11:38 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] kbuild: improve version string logic
Hi Michal,
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:59:11 +0100 Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> Stephen, won't this break your linux-next scripts in any way? The final
> build won't change, because of the next-YYYYMMDD tag, but the builds in
> between will have the '+' appended to their version.
I think it should be OK - I don't depend on the kernel version for
anything until the very end. If it does cause a problem, I am now
forwarned and can fix my scripts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists