linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: add ARM support to decodecode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100105173120.GA10941@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:31:20 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, mmarek@...e.cz,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	wangcong@...ux.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: add ARM support to decodecode

On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 07:06:58AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> I'm fine with this, but I wonder if ARM could switch to the <>
> convention for the faulting instruction, just to keep things
> consistent..

I did mention exactly that on the previous review round on this patch;
the problem is that it won't change older kernels, and if anyone is
still using ksymoops or similar parsing stuff, it could break on
such a change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/