[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100105180026.GG1778@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 19:00:26 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"hugh.dickins" <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] mm: handle_speculative_fault()
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:47:49AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > > Oh well. Somebody who is bored might look at trying to make the wrapper
> > > code in arch/x86/lib/semaphore_32.S work on x86-64 too. It should make the
> > > successful rwsem cases much faster.
> >
> > Maybe, maybe not.
>
> What we saw in the past was that the cost of acquiring exclusive
> access to the contended cachelines containing mmap_sem and rss counters
> was most important.
That cost should be about the same between the spinlock and the atomic version.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists