[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100105190455.GE30868@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 19:04:55 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2/9] Add a kernel_address() that works for data too
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:58:53AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> But you can trust _etext an almost all architectures.
> It is a bug if it is missing.
>
> So [_text, _etext] is the text section.
>
> The data section may be placed before or after - it depends on the architecture.
> But again - only some architectures define _sdata.
> But all? define _edata.
You can not guarantee that the data segment is after the text segment,
unless you want to outlaw XIP kernels. XIP kernels have the text
segment mapped at a completely different address to the data segment.
I'd suggest the only way to identify the data segment in a generic way
is to have everyone define _sdata, or more preferably _data (to be
consistent with _text), to be the start of the data segment.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists