[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <12626498423064-git-send-email->
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:04:01 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: add debug check for too many rcu_read_unlock()
From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
TREE_PREEMPT_RCU maintains an rcu_read_lock_nesting counter in the
task structure, which happens to be a signed int. So this patch adds a
check for this counter being negative at the end of __rcu_read_unlock().
This check is under CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, so can be thought of as being
part of lockdep.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index f11ebd4..e77cdf3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -304,6 +304,9 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
if (--ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting) == 0 &&
unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special)))
rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting) < 0);
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_unlock);
--
1.5.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists