linux-kernel - [27/39] udf: Try harder when looking for VAT inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100105200302.477162944@mini.kroah.org>
Date:	Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:02:23 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	stable-review@...nel.org
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [27/39] udf: Try harder when looking for VAT inode

2.6.31-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit e971b0b9e0dd50d9ceecb67a6a6ab80a80906033 upstream.

Some disks do not contain VAT inode in the last recorded block as required
by the standard but a few blocks earlier (or the number of recorded blocks
is wrong). So look for the VAT inode a bit before the end of the media.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 fs/udf/super.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/udf/super.c
+++ b/fs/udf/super.c
@@ -1078,21 +1078,39 @@ static int udf_fill_partdesc_info(struct
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int udf_load_vat(struct super_block *sb, int p_index, int type1_index)
+static void udf_find_vat_block(struct super_block *sb, int p_index,
+			       int type1_index, sector_t start_block)
 {
 	struct udf_sb_info *sbi = UDF_SB(sb);
 	struct udf_part_map *map = &sbi->s_partmaps[p_index];
+	sector_t vat_block;
 	struct kernel_lb_addr ino;
+
+	/*
+	 * VAT file entry is in the last recorded block. Some broken disks have
+	 * it a few blocks before so try a bit harder...
+	 */
+	ino.partitionReferenceNum = type1_index;
+	for (vat_block = start_block;
+	     vat_block >= map->s_partition_root &&
+	     vat_block >= start_block - 3 &&
+	     !sbi->s_vat_inode; vat_block--) {
+		ino.logicalBlockNum = vat_block - map->s_partition_root;
+		sbi->s_vat_inode = udf_iget(sb, &ino);
+	}
+}
+
+static int udf_load_vat(struct super_block *sb, int p_index, int type1_index)
+{
+	struct udf_sb_info *sbi = UDF_SB(sb);
+	struct udf_part_map *map = &sbi->s_partmaps[p_index];
 	struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
 	struct udf_inode_info *vati;
 	uint32_t pos;
 	struct virtualAllocationTable20 *vat20;
 	sector_t blocks = sb->s_bdev->bd_inode->i_size >> sb->s_blocksize_bits;
 
-	/* VAT file entry is in the last recorded block */
-	ino.partitionReferenceNum = type1_index;
-	ino.logicalBlockNum = sbi->s_last_block - map->s_partition_root;
-	sbi->s_vat_inode = udf_iget(sb, &ino);
+	udf_find_vat_block(sb, p_index, type1_index, sbi->s_last_block);
 	if (!sbi->s_vat_inode &&
 	    sbi->s_last_block != blocks - 1) {
 		printk(KERN_NOTICE "UDF-fs: Failed to read VAT inode from the"
@@ -1100,9 +1118,7 @@ static int udf_load_vat(struct super_blo
 		       "block of the device (%lu).\n",
 		       (unsigned long)sbi->s_last_block,
 		       (unsigned long)blocks - 1);
-		ino.partitionReferenceNum = type1_index;
-		ino.logicalBlockNum = blocks - 1 - map->s_partition_root;
-		sbi->s_vat_inode = udf_iget(sb, &ino);
+		udf_find_vat_block(sb, p_index, type1_index, blocks - 1);
 	}
 	if (!sbi->s_vat_inode)
 		return 1;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/