[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201001052223.21964.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 22:23:21 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Bartłomiej Zimoń <uzi18@...pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@...tmail.fm>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, awalls@...ix.net,
danborkmann@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [suspend/resume] Re: userspace notification from module
On Tuesday 05 January 2010, Bartłomiej Zimoń wrote:
> Dnia 5 stycznia 2010 10:07 Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@...tmail.fm> napisał(a):
> >
> > rjw@...k.pl said:
> > >> > I don't see a problem with this in principle, although I don't think signals
> > >> > are very suitable for this particular purpose, because you need two-way
> > >> > communication between the power manager and the processes it's going to
> > >> > notify (because it has to wait for the processes to finish their preparations
> > >> > and to tell it that they are ready).
> >
> > Wouldn't there need to be dependecy tracking for the userspace processes? A
> > process couldn't signal "done" until it know there's no more work to do, which
> > requires all other processes to finish up first.
> >
>
> Not all processes will need pm notification.
>
> Just in case, could this "power manager" be provided as userspace
> driver for kernel (for example compiled as UIO)?
I don't really understand why you want to do that in the kernel. Is there
any particular reason why this cannot be done in the user space?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists