linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: packet: option to only pass skb protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:40:38 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mst@...hat.com
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: packet: option to only pass skb protocol

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 22:50:40 +0200

> binding socket to device might be done by a separate process
> from the one doing sendmsg, and IMO the device socket is bound
> to might change at any time.
> 
> So the sending process would need to get socket name before
> each sendmsg.
> 
> Makes sense?

Not really, when it's at the expense of everyone else.

If you can pass the FD around, you can pass around auxiliary
information as well.

Make sense? :-)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/