linux-kernel - Re: [this_cpu_xx V9 5/7] this_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B43CEF4.1050903@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:44:52 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V9 5/7] this_cpu_ops: page allocator conversion

On 01/06/2010 12:22 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
>> The above chunk causes build failure due to removed ret used later on
>> return statement.  Changed it to return NOTIFY_OK.
> 
> Thats a change in -next? Patch was against upstream.

I don't think the build failure was specific to the percpu branch.
pageset_cpuup_callback() returns ret on upstream too.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/