[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1262651630-7354-44-git-send-email-gregkh@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:32:57 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
stable-review@...nel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
562016-quiet@...s.debian.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 44/97] cfg80211: fix race between deauth and assoc response
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
commit 3bdb2d48c5f58c781a4099c99044384a23620884 upstream.
Joseph Nahmias reported, in http://bugs.debian.org/562016,
that he was getting the following warning (with some log
around the issue):
ath0: direct probe to AP 00:11:95:77:e0:b0 (try 1)
ath0: direct probe responded
ath0: authenticate with AP 00:11:95:77:e0:b0 (try 1)
ath0: authenticated
ath0: associate with AP 00:11:95:77:e0:b0 (try 1)
ath0: deauthenticating from 00:11:95:77:e0:b0 by local choice (reason=3)
ath0: direct probe to AP 00:11:95:77:e0:b0 (try 1)
ath0: RX AssocResp from 00:11:95:77:e0:b0 (capab=0x421 status=0 aid=2)
ath0: associated
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at net/wireless/mlme.c:97 cfg80211_send_rx_assoc+0x14d/0x152 [cfg80211]()
Hardware name: 7658CTO
...
Pid: 761, comm: phy0 Not tainted 2.6.32-trunk-686 #1
Call Trace:
[<c1030a5d>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x5e/0x8a
[<c1030a93>] ? warn_slowpath_null+0xa/0xc
[<f86cafc7>] ? cfg80211_send_rx_assoc+0x14d/0x152
...
ath0: link becomes ready
ath0: deauthenticating from 00:11:95:77:e0:b0 by local choice (reason=3)
ath0: no IPv6 routers present
ath0: link is not ready
ath0: direct probe to AP 00:11:95:77:e0:b0 (try 1)
ath0: direct probe responded
ath0: authenticate with AP 00:11:95:77:e0:b0 (try 1)
ath0: authenticated
ath0: associate with AP 00:11:95:77:e0:b0 (try 1)
ath0: RX ReassocResp from 00:11:95:77:e0:b0 (capab=0x421 status=0 aid=2)
ath0: associated
It is not clear to me how the first "direct probe" here
happens, but this seems to be a race condition, if the
user requests to deauth after requesting assoc, but before
the assoc response is received. In that case, it may
happen that mac80211 tries to report the assoc success to
cfg80211, but gets blocked on the wdev lock that is held
because the user is requesting the deauth.
The result is that we run into a warning. This is mostly
harmless, but maybe cause an unexpected event to be sent
to userspace; we'd send an assoc success event although
userspace was no longer expecting that.
To fix this, remove the warning and check whether the
race happened and in that case abort processing.
Reported-by: Joseph Nahmias <joe@...mias.net>
Cc: 562016-quiet@...s.debian.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
net/wireless/mlme.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/mlme.c b/net/wireless/mlme.c
index 0a6b7a0..0d86248 100644
--- a/net/wireless/mlme.c
+++ b/net/wireless/mlme.c
@@ -94,7 +94,18 @@ void cfg80211_send_rx_assoc(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
}
}
- WARN_ON(!bss);
+ /*
+ * We might be coming here because the driver reported
+ * a successful association at the same time as the
+ * user requested a deauth. In that case, we will have
+ * removed the BSS from the auth_bsses list due to the
+ * deauth request when the assoc response makes it. If
+ * the two code paths acquire the lock the other way
+ * around, that's just the standard situation of a
+ * deauth being requested while connected.
+ */
+ if (!bss)
+ goto out;
} else if (wdev->conn) {
cfg80211_sme_failed_assoc(wdev);
need_connect_result = false;
--
1.6.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists