linux-kernel - [PATCH alt.2] af_packet: Don't use skb after dev_queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100106091532.GA10201@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:15:32 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Michael Breuer <mbreuer@...jas.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	flyboy@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH alt.2] af_packet: Don't use skb after dev_queue_xmit()

On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 07:22:08AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:36:28PM -0500, Michael Breuer wrote:
> > Is it possible that this patch is causing the transmission to  
> > momentarily halt such that the overall utilization appears low at the  
> > time I see the interrupt errors, vs. the other patch which perhaps  
> > doesn't interrupt the traffic flow quite so much?
> 
> Yes, without this patch xmit could be stopped earlier on some kind of
> errors, with retransmit of the last message possible. On the other
> hand, other dev_queue_xmit() (negative) errors, are ignored. So this
> place could be still improved by adding proper err handling (or
> removing getting err return from dev_queue_xmit() at all).

On the other hand, returning just this one net_xmit_errno() would be
consistent with non-MMAP sendmsg, so here is an alternative version
for testing.

Thanks,
Jarek P.

-----------------> (alternative #2)

tpacket_snd() can change and kfree an skb after dev_queue_xmit(),
which is illegal.

With debugging by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>

Reported-by: Michael Breuer <mbreuer@...jas.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
---

 net/packet/af_packet.c |    8 +++-----
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index e0516a2..aba2049 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -1021,9 +1021,10 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
 
 		status = TP_STATUS_SEND_REQUEST;
 		err = dev_queue_xmit(skb);
-		if (unlikely(err > 0 && (err = net_xmit_errno(err)) != 0))
-			goto out_xmit;
 		packet_increment_head(&po->tx_ring);
+		if (unlikely(err > 0 && (err = net_xmit_errno(err)) != 0))
+			goto out_put;
+
 		len_sum += tp_len;
 	} while (likely((ph != NULL) ||
 			((!(msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT)) &&
@@ -1033,9 +1034,6 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
 	err = len_sum;
 	goto out_put;
 
-out_xmit:
-	skb->destructor = sock_wfree;
-	atomic_dec(&po->tx_ring.pending);
 out_status:
 	__packet_set_status(po, ph, status);
 	kfree_skb(skb);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/