[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a44ae5cd1001061006i63579096me4d598b06cc358f9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:06:46 -0500
From: Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>
To: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Sylvain Meyer <sylvain.meyer@...ldonline.fr>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images
displayed are side by side (should only show one).
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Bruno Prémont
<bonbons@...ux-vserver.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 06 January 2010 Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com> wrote:
>> For a long time I have gotten two pictures of Tux showing up when I
>> include the Tux display option in my custom kernel builds. I don't
>> know how many kernel revisions ago it was when I started noticing
>> this. It seems like it might have been early in the 2.6 series
>> kernels.
>
> Unless your system has exactly one CPU without hyperthreading and with
> exactly one core this is the correct bahavior, one tux per logical CPU.
>
> If you just want a single tux you can run your kernel on a system with
> only one logical CPU, boot it with maxcpus=1 or rebuild it with
> CONFIG_SMP=n... though in those case you will not be able to benefit
> from all of your CPU's resources..
>
> Bruno
Oh! Well, that explains it. That is truly weird functionality. Is
Tux a de facto
CPU presence indicator? It doesn't make any sense to me, if so.
Miles
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists