linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/12] PCI PM: Make it possible to force using INTx for PCIe PME signaling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Jan 2010 00:00:41 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/12] PCI PM: Make it possible to force using INTx for PCIe PME signaling

On Wednesday 06 January 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 01:56:25PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> 
> > This scares me a little... seems like we're not restoring some state on
> > resume that's needed for MSIs to work?  Looks fine though.
> 
> Yeah, that was my concern. We debugged this a little on IRC and didn't 
> get anywhere, though, so probably need to find someone who knows more 
> about MSIs...

I'd rather say someone who knows more about ICH7. :-)

MSIs work just fine after resume for the other devices in the same box,
so I'd say it's a chipset issue.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/