linux-kernel - Re: Memory probing fails after 2.6.30 (bisected)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51f3faa71001061553q29e0821evda63c4ca3eeee3b1@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:53:19 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
To:	Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@...tmail.fm>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Memory probing fails after 2.6.30 (bisected)

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@...tmail.fm> wrote:
>
> hancockrwd@...il.com said:
>> Think you missed posting which was the actual bad commit it reported?
>
> The last one in the list:
> 8ecee4620e76aae418bfa0e8cc830e92cb559bbb
>
> That's a merge commit. How do i dig futher into that? My git-fu is lacking...

AFAIK, the bisect shouldn't land on a merge commit unless the changes
in the commit itself are what are causing the problem, and the merge
commit itself doesn't have any changes. Is it possible something went
wrong in the bisect and one of your good/bad results was incorrect?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/