[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001052007090.3630@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:20:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
"hugh.dickins" <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] mm: handle_speculative_fault()
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> >
> > Of course, your other load with MADV_DONTNEED seems to be horrible, and
> > has some nasty spinlock issues, but that looks like a separate deal (I
> > assume that load is just very hard on the pgtable lock).
>
> It's zone->lock, I guess. My test program avoids pgtable lock problem.
Yeah, I should have looked more at your callchain. That's nasty. Much
worse than the per-mm lock. I thought the page buffering would avoid the
zone lock becoming a huge problem, but clearly not in this case.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists