[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B443695.5090301@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:07:01 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: O_* bit numbers uniqueness check
Le 06/01/2010 07:55, Wu Fengguang a écrit :
> The O_* bit numbers are defined in 20+ arch/*, and hence can silently
> overlap. Add a boot time check to ensure the uniqueness as suggested
> by David Miller.
>
> CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> CC: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
> CC: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> ---
> {
> + /* please add new bits here to ensure allocation uniqueness */
> + BUG_ON(20 != hweight32(
> + O_RDONLY | O_WRONLY | O_RDWR |
> + O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_NOCTTY |
> + O_TRUNC | O_APPEND | O_NONBLOCK |
> + O_SYNC | FASYNC | O_DIRECT |
> + O_LARGEFILE | O_DIRECTORY | O_NOFOLLOW |
> + O_NOATIME | O_CLOEXEC | O_RANDOM |
> + FMODE_EXEC | FMODE_NONOTIFY));
> +
I cannot test it, but given O_RDONLY is 0, are you sure 20 bits are actually set ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists