linux-kernel - Re: tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1262763885.1034.1.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:44:45 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc:	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1

On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 14:52 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 13:55 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 14:01 +0800, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Have you tried tbench with the vmark regression fix?  If not, mind
> > > giving it a shot?
> 
> I just test the patch with 2.6.33-rc2, but no help.
> Still ~4% regression compared to 2.6.32.

Darn.  Thanks for testing.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/