linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mmotm] build fix for memcg-move-charges-of-anonymous-swap.patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:14:01 +0900
From:	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mmotm] build fix for
 memcg-move-charges-of-anonymous-swap.patch

On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 13:30:26 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 13:06:09 +0900
> Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > build fix in !CONFIG_SWAP case.
> > 
> >   CC      mm/memcontrol.o
> > mm/memcontrol.c: In function 'is_target_pte_for_mc':
> > mm/memcontrol.c:3648: error: implicit declaration of function 'mem_cgroup_count_swap_user'
> > make[1]: *** [mm/memcontrol.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [mm] Error 2
> > 
> > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
> 
> Hmm, this doesn't seem include fix for CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP=n
> ==
> static int is_target_pte_for_mc(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>                 unsigned long addr, pte_t ptent, union mc_target *target)
> {
> ....
>                 else if (is_swap_pte(ptent)) {
>                         ent = pte_to_swp_entry(ptent);
>                         if (!move_anon || non_swap_entry(ent))
>                                 return 0;
>                         usage_count = mem_cgroup_count_swap_user(ent, &page);
>                 }
> ==
> At least, !do_swap_account check is necessary, I think.
> I'm sorry if I miss something...
> 
mem_cgroup_count_swap_user() is defined in CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR case,
so the build error has nothing to do with CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP(i.e. do_swap_account).
And I think adding !do_swap_account would ignore unmaped-but-not-uncharged-yet
swapcache in CONFIG_SWAP && !CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP case.
(it would not be a big problem though).

Anyway, I'm sorry that the first patch was wrong...
This is the correct one.

===
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>

build fix in !CONFIG_SWAP case.

  CC      mm/memcontrol.o
mm/memcontrol.c: In function 'is_target_pte_for_mc':
mm/memcontrol.c:3648: error: implicit declaration of function 'mem_cgroup_count_swap_user'
make[1]: *** [mm/memcontrol.o] Error 1
make: *** [mm] Error 2

Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
---
This can be applied after memcg-move-charges-of-anonymous-swap.patch.

 include/linux/swap.h |    8 ++++++++
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index d9b06f7..c2a4295 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -488,6 +488,14 @@ mem_cgroup_uncharge_swapcache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t ent)
 {
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
+static inline int
+mem_cgroup_count_swap_user(swp_entry_t ent, struct page **pagep)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_SWAP */
 #endif /* __KERNEL__*/
 #endif /* _LINUX_SWAP_H */
-- 
1.5.6.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/