[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100107123841.GX3059@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 18:08:41 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: How should we handle CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTRL_SWAP (Re: [PATCH
-mmotm] build fix for memcg-move-charges-of-anonymous-swap.patch)
* Daisuke Nishimura <d-nishimura@....biglobe.ne.jp> [2010-01-07 20:23:35]:
> (Changed the subject and Cc list)
>
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:52:23 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > BTW, maybe it's time to
> > - remove EXPERIMENTAL from CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTRL_SWAP
> > and more,
> > - remove CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTRL_SWAP
> > (to reduce complicated #ifdefs and replace them with CONFIG_SWAP.)
> >
> > It's very stable as far as I test.
> >
> I agree on both.
>
> Balbir-san, What do you think ?
>
I agree, the experimental marking can go and CONFIG_SWAP can replace
the current config option.
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists