lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:45:12 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
CC:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
	David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2()

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   my normal pedantry coming to the surface, but can we at least assume
> that people will use this test to *legitimately* test whether or not
> something is a power of two, and not that there is a single bit set
> (in the case of mask bits where all settings must be mutually
> exclusive)?
> 
>   there's a lot of this sort of thing throughout the kernel:
> 
>     (n) != 0 && (((n) & ((n) - 1))
> 
> but it's sometimes unclear whether someone is testing for a) power of
> two, or b) single bit set.  if you're going to introduce that kind of
> BUILD BUG (which is a good idea), let's try to not immediately abuse
> it semantically. :-)

It's merely about math, not about semantics.  Plus, its application is
restricted to build-time checks (of defined constants) anyway.

Hence I would argue that "check at build time whether a defined
bitmask's Hamming weight is 1; abort build if it isn't" can be
legitimately and sufficiently readably implemented by means of the new
BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2().
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- ---= --===
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ