[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100107163439.9962b3b1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:34:39 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: revert to show stack information in
/proc/{pid}/status
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:21:30 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:12:22 +0900 (JST)
> > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thus, this patch revert it.
> >
> > OK, thanks, I applied the full revert.
> >
> > We can look at a new and less costly implementation of this feature for
> > 2.6.34 if desired. In which case, all we have done is to delay the feature
> > by one release, which is not a big deal.
>
> Thanks.
>
> note: my patch isn't full revert too. Commit d899bf7b introduced two
> feature (btw, I don't like one patch have two feature).
>
> 1) Add the annotattion of [thread stack: xxxx] mark to
> /proc/{pid}/task/{tid}/maps.
> 2) Add StackUsage field to /proc/{pid}/status.
>
> I only revert (2), because I haven't seen (1) cause regression.
>
>
Ah, thanks. I've updated the patch title and changelog to reflect that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists