[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B475E33.4050407@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:32:51 +0100
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sections mismatch detection
Sam Ravnborg napsal(a):
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>> Sam Ravnborg napsal(a):
>>>> I would prefer to see (logically) the same section mismatch not be
>>>> reported multiple times, even though they are in different binary
>>>> files. This would reduce the noise level quite a bit IMO.
>>> That would be nice but is not trivially doable.
>>> We need to discover when there is a section mismatch
>>> resulting from for example a function in kernel/*
>>> calling a function in arch/$ARCH/kernel so we
>>> need to execute the check on multiple levels
>>> i order to catch the bugs as early as possible.
>>>
>>> The easy 'fix' would be to execute the check only
>>> on vmlinux.o (default behaviour) but the added
>>> checks with the option enabled allows us to
>>> be much more precise in reporting where
>>> the section mismatch originate from.
>> But we could remember the (caller,callee) pairs and only emit the first
>> warning. Or am I missing something?
>
> The warnings comes from individual calls to mdpost.
Ah, that was the piece I was missing :).
Thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists