linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: nfs/ceph tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100108121903.6a096bc1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:19:03 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: nfs/ceph tree build failure

Hi Trond,

On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:18:33 -0500 Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no> wrote:
>
> The patch itself looks correct to me.

Thanks for the confirmation.

> How would you like me to proceed? Should I revert the VM changes from
> the NFS linux-next tree, or would you be OK with keeping the above patch
> for now?

I am OK with keeping the patch - we just need to remember it during the
next merge window.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped