linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client bugfixes....

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Jan 2010 17:30:50 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client bugfixes....

On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> 
> I don't think anyone has been advocating doing the revalidation _after_
> the call to mmap_region(). All I want is to be able to do it as part of
> the mmap() syscall. It would be quite OK to add a ->pre_mmap() (which is
> what I believe Peter's patches do).

->pre_mmap is better, but not obviously so. We'd have to call ->pre_mmap() 
so _long_ before the mmap that it might be that the mmap never happens at 
all (due to errors happening later). 

Sounds like that would work in your particular case, though.

However, I still suspect that the lock inversion problem can probably be 
fixed without any of that at all. Maybe you can just break the chain 
somewhere else. I've not actually seen the lockdep chain, so I don't know 
the deails. Pointers?

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/