[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B46BC6F.5060607@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:02:39 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
To: "Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"y-goto@...fujitsu.com" <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
"Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH - resend] Memory-Hotplug: Fix the bug on interface /dev/mem
for 64-bit kernel(v1)
On 01/07/2010 07:32 PM, Zheng, Shaohui wrote:
> Resend the patch to the mailing-list, the original patch URL is
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69075/, it is not accepted without comments,
> sent it again to review.
>
> Memory-Hotplug: Fix the bug on interface /dev/mem for 64-bit kernel
>
> The new added memory can not be access by interface /dev/mem, because we do not
> update the variable high_memory. This patch add a new e820 entry in e820 table,
> and update max_pfn, max_low_pfn and high_memory.
>
> We add a function update_pfn in file arch/x86/mm/init.c to udpate these
> varibles. Memory hotplug does not make sense on 32-bit kernel, so we did not
> concern it in this function.
>
Memory hotplug makes sense on 32-bit kernels, at least in virtual
environments.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists