linux-kernel - HID: is scancode correctly reported after key status change in hidinput_hid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B489B44.50101@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:05:40 +0100
From:	Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: HID: is scancode correctly reported after key status change in hidinput_hid_event()?

vi drivers/hid/hid-input.c +634 and not in hidinput_hid_event()

 	/* report the usage code as scancode if the key status has changed */
	if (usage->type == EV_KEY && !!test_bit(usage->code, input->key) != value)
 		input_event(input, EV_MSC, MSC_SCAN, usage->hid);

Only if value is 1 or 0 the input_event() can occur, but value doesn't
seem to be intended to be used as a boolean. are we really doing the
correct test here?

Roel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/