linux-kernel - Re: Linux Serial Performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:32:19 -0800
From:	"Paul G. Allen" <pgallen@...il.com>
To:	Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
	"Paul G. Allen" <pgallen@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux Serial Performance

Well, as far as I know. Same code on both systems. The embedded device
operates at 115200, 8N1, no flow control. It uses RPC/SLIP protocol
for commands and data. They talk to each other, but the Linux system
just takes forever to send the data.

PGA

On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Samuel Thibault
<samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org> wrote:
> Paul G. Allen, le Sat 09 Jan 2010 10:57:48 -0800, a écrit :
>> In all cases, the profiler shows the serial Tx
>> to be about 20x faster (twenty times) on Windows XP than in Linux.
>
> Did you properly set the serial port speed?
>
> Samuel
>



-- 
Paul G. Allen
Random Logic Consulting
www.randomlogic.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/