linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Fix up the NFS mmap code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:57:27 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
cc:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Fix up the NFS mmap code



On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> readdir() is certainly a red herring.

That's the one that lockdep reports, though. I still don't see why. Afaik, 
the only place where NFS gets an inode is nfs_fhget(), and that seems to 
do things correctly.

> write(), OTOH, is quite real. And there we do i_mutex followed by 
> pagefaults.

Ho humm.. 

> Could we please get a sane expalanation of the reasons why nfs mmap
> wants i_mutex in the first place?  Before we add yet another hook
> from hell and complicate already overcomplicated area...

Yeah, agreed.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/