[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100110222129.GA3606@del.dom.local>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:21:29 +0100
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mbreuer@...jas.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, flyboy@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6 resent] af_packet: Don't use skb after
dev_queue_xmit()
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 01:51:35PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 13:38:27 +0100
>
> > tpacket_snd() can change and kfree an skb after dev_queue_xmit(),
> > which is illegal.
> >
> > With debugging by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
> >
> > Reported-by: Michael Breuer <mbreuer@...jas.com>
> > Tested-by: Michael Breuer <mbreuer@...jas.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
> > Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
>
> Jarek, if this code path triggers, it will deadlock the
> send ring with your changes.
>
> We will now leave the ring packet status in the "SENDING" state.
>
> That's not right.
No, the destructor of this skb, tpacket_destruct_skb(), will clean
this. (Just like for other skbs kfreed during dev_queue_xmit().)
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists