[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100111151539.GP4489@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:15:39 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Divyesh Shah <dpshah@...gle.com>
Cc: czoccolo@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nauman@...gle.com, mikew@...gle.com, ctalbott@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: Respect ioprio_class when preempting
On Wed, Jan 06 2010, Divyesh Shah wrote:
> In cfq_should_preempt(), we currently allow some cases where a non-RT request
> can preempt an ongoing RT cfqq timeslice. This should not happen.
> Examples include:
>
> o A sync_noidle wl type non-RT request pre-empting a sync_noidle wl type cfqq
> on which we are idling.
> o Once we have per-cgroup async queues, a non-RT sync request pre-empting a RT
> async cfqq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Divyesh Shah<dpshah@...gle.com>
> ---
>
> block/cfq-iosched.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> index 7d6cef9..e9e6610 100644
> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> @@ -3104,6 +3104,12 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
> return true;
>
> /*
> + * Don't allow a non-RT request to preempt an ongoing RT cfqq timeslice.
> + */
> + if (cfq_class_rt(cfqq) && !cfq_class_rt(new_cfqq))
> + return false;
It would be nice to just be able to do
if (new_cfqq->ioprio_class > cfqq->ioprio_class)
return false;
but that doesn't quite work given IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE < _RT. So I think
your patch is fine, I've added it. Thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists