[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100111174922.GA17285@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:49:22 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: Michael Stone <michael@...top.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, David Lang <david@...g.hm>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
"C. Scott Ananian" <cscott@...ott.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Bernie Innocenti <bernie@...ewiz.org>,
Mark Seaborn <mrs@...hic-beasts.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Samir Bellabes <sam@...ack.fr>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Security: Implement disablenetwork semantics. (v4)
Quoting Michael Stone (michael@...top.org):
> Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> >Michael Stone wrote:
> >>Examples of software that I want to be able to gain privileges normally include:
> >>
> >> rainbow, which requires privilege in order to add new accounts to the system
> >> and in order to call setuid() but which does not require networking
> >> privileges.
> >
> >If the system is not using local files (i.e. /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow),
> >the process who wants to add new accounts to the system might need network
> >access (e.g. to LDAP server), doesn't it?
>
> General purpose account manipulation tools might need network access but
> rainbow handles all its account manipulations via state stored in
> /var/spool/rainbow/2. This state is made available to the rest of the system
> via libnss_rainbow.
>
> Michael
Michael, I'm sorry, I should go back and search the thread for the
answer, but don't have time right now - do you really need
disablenetwork to be available to unprivileged users? Or is it ok
to require CAP_SETPCAP (same thing required for dropping privs from
bounding set)? Surely rainbow could be started either with that
capability, or even from a smaller, easier-to-audit wrapper that
has the capability, calls disablenetwork, then launches rainbow?
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists