[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100111203356.GU24885@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:33:56 -0500
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, aris@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: introduce NMI_AUTO as nmi_watchdog option
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:27:29PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 02:16:33PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> > Hi Ingo,
> >
> ...
> > I was going to jump in and try to do this work. I wanted to make sure
> > what you were looking for here. When you say convert nmi watchdog to perf
> > events, I assume you mean merging over the bits of perfctr-watchdog.c to
> > perf_events.c, modify nmi.c to just register as a normal perf event and
> > probably cleanup the oprofile stuff to match, correct?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Don
> >
>
> As far as I know -- converting perfctr-watchdog.c to into perfevents
> style would be quite a desirable feature. But I still didn't manage to
> find time for this task :( If you're interested to start this work
> -- that would be just great!
After looking through the code I just had some questions, perhaps you have
thought about this longer than me, what to do with the reservation code
(just remove it I assume and let perf_events _be_ the only code that
handles perf events) and what to do with some of the cpu quirks as noted
in perfctr-watchdog.c (notable some of the Intel errata for the Core
chipsets).
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists