linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/6] cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:11:36 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node

On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:55:09 +1100
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org> wrote:

> A number of places in the kernel use cpumask_of_node(-1), but most arch
> NUMA implementations are broken. The following patches fix this.
> 

So..  what's happening here?  Nobody has applied the patches anywhere,
you later said "the scheduler oopses in a number of places with
CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and sparse node ids" and mention of a -stable backport
was mentioned.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/