[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100111141136.0ee352b3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:11:36 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:55:09 +1100
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org> wrote:
> A number of places in the kernel use cpumask_of_node(-1), but most arch
> NUMA implementations are broken. The following patches fix this.
>
So.. what's happening here? Nobody has applied the patches anywhere,
you later said "the scheduler oopses in a number of places with
CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and sparse node ids" and mention of a -stable backport
was mentioned.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists