[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100111.155912.68138954.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:59:12 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mpm@...enic.com
Cc: danborkmann@...glemail.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jmoyer@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, netdev@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: allow execution of multiple rx_hooks per
interface
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:21:48 -0600
> Looks pretty good. Dave?
>
> Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
I don't like the loop for RX ARP processing.
The packet contents aren't going to change, so doing basic
packet validation inside of the "for each RX client" loop
of arp_reply() doesn't make any sense.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists