[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1263193528.6444.21.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:05:28 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14621] specjbb2005 and aim7 regression with 2.6.32-rc
kernels
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14621
> Subject : specjbb2005 and aim7 regression with 2.6.32-rc kernels
> Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
> Date : 2009-11-06 7:38 (66 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125749310413174&w=4
FWIW, I couldn't reproduce the aim7 regression with my one little disk,
the opposite in fact, attributable to cfq low_latency switch.
(don't have specjbb2005, can't try to reproduce that one)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists