[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B4BC2D3.7070003@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:31:15 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- INFO: possible recursive locking -- (s_active){++++.+},
at: [<c10d2941>] sysfs_hash_and_remove+0x3d/0x4f
On 01/11/2010 11:26 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:13:35 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] sysfs: Add support for lockdep subclasses to s_active
>
> We have apparently valid cases where the code for a sysfs attribute
> removes other sysfs attributes. Without support for subclasses
> lockdep flags a possible recursive lock problem as it figures
> the first sysfs attribute could be attempting to remove itself.
>
> By adding support for sysfs subclasses we can teach lockdep to
> distinguish between different types of sysfs attributes and not
> get confused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists