[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100112142404.GD18532@trinity.fluff.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:24:04 +0000
From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Francesco VIRLINZI <francesco.virlinzi@...com>,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 1/7 v2] Add a common struct clk
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:01:49AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:48:44AM +0100, Francesco VIRLINZI wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy
> > In November I already sent a proposal on
> > a generic linux clk framework.
> > On that I would suggest:
> >
> >>
> >> +struct clk {
> >> + const struct clk_operations *ops;
> >>
> > spinlock_t lock;
> > const char *name;
> > int id;
>
> Name and ID are totally pointless, unless you insist on using the clk
> API in the wrong way (like S3C does.)
I do intend to change the clock lookup on the Samsung series, but we're
currently in the process of trying to do a whole pile of work on not
only adding new SoCs but also cleaning up the existing support and making
a whole pile of code common to all the Samsung SoC family.
I never got the time to go throughly through Francesco's clock framework
but it seemed rathe rcomplicated for our current requirements and also
had a whole pile of style problems that made it really difficult to read.
--
Ben
Q: What's a light-year?
A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists