[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B4BC683.7060508@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:46:59 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...et.ca>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] sysfs: Keep an nlink count on sysfs directories.
Hello,
On 01/12/2010 05:21 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> On large directories sysfs_count_nlinks can be a significant
> bottleneck, so keep a count in sysfs_dirent.
I was about to suggest changing s_flags to ushort too. Hmmm... adding
a new field to sysfs_dirent somewhat worries me but this doesn't add
to the size of the structure. How significant bottlenect are we
talking about?
> If we exceed the maximum number of directory entries we can store
> return nlink of 1. An nlink of 1 matches what reiserfs does in this
> case, and it let's find and similar utlities know that we have a the
> directory nlink can not be used for optimization purposes.
Hmmm... what's the limit on reiserfs? Is it 64k too?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists