lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:06:00 -0800
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Dongdong Deng <libfetion@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ananth@...ibm.com,
	anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	mhiramat@...hat.com, jkenisto@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: Did we really need to clear the IF flag at prepare_singlestep()
 of  x86 kprobes?

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:09:35 +0800
Dongdong Deng <libfetion@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi Kprobe experts,
> 
> I have a doubt about the handling "X86_EFLAGS_IF" at
> prepare_singlestep(), Could you give me some suggestions?


iirc it was a security thing; we used to have some exploits
due to the linux-abi entry points which caused a mess, and this
was put there as defensive programming.

I could totally misremember this as well of course.


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ