lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121254160.17145@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:57:15 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	"ananth@...ibm.com" <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] use nr_cpus= to set nr_cpu_ids early



On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> Trouble is that NR_CPUS is used all over the place. If nr_cpu_ids < 
> NR_CPUS at boot then there is a danger of for loops to NR_CPUS going out 
> of bounds.
> 
> CONFIG_NR_CPUS is used for various bitmaps so that seems to be okay.
> 
> drivers/acpi/numa.c:acpi_numa_init probably should use nr_cpu_ids 
> instead now.
> 
> There is an octeon driver in staging that has some issues with NR_CPUS 
> as well.

I suspect that this is the real reason for the current behavior of 
'maxcpus=', and that if all of those issues get fixed we could probably 
make maxcpus do what Yinghai's new 'nr_cpus=' does.

So in a perfect world, CONFIG_NR_CPUS's would never really be used, except 
for some fundamental static allocations/limits that are too painful to try 
to make dynamic.

I doubt that anybody really _cares_ about the "you can add them later" 
behavior of the current maxcpus thing, and I suspect that the nr_cpus 
semantics is what people generally would have expected.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ