[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100112140754.fe75f501.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:07:54 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: mrb74@....at
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>, stable@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15005] New: Segmentation fault when shutting
down
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:59:20 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15005
>
> Summary: Segmentation fault when shutting down
> Product: ACPI
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.32.3
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: blocking
> Priority: P1
> Component: Power-Off
> AssignedTo: acpi_power-off@...nel-bugs.osdl.org
> ReportedBy: mrb74@....at
> Regression: Yes
>
>
> Created an attachment (id=24479)
> --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=24479)
> Screenshot of segmentation fault
>
> Currently compiled newest kernel 2.6.32.3 for Atom based netbook (datacask
> Jupiter 1014a). Compiled the kernel with optimizations for Atom CPUs and also
> with optimizations for i586.
> When shutting down the system the kernel produces a segmentation fault at the
> end of the shutdown process. Powering off fails. Both kernel fail with the same
> error.
> Last working kernel was 2.6.32.2.
>
It's a shutdown-time oops in clockevents_notify(). A 2.6.32.2 ->
2.6.32.3 regression.
2.6.32.3 included this prime suspect:
: commit fa3f5a5c1c8e6a2cbc7e21755ea7c215f8cf0577
: Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
: Date: Thu Dec 10 15:35:10 2009 +0100
:
: clockevents: Prevent clockevent_devices list corruption on cpu hotplug
:
: commit bb6eddf7676e1c1f3e637aa93c5224488d99036f upstream.
:
: which
So we may well have the same regression in 2.6.33-rcX.
Martin, can you please check whether the below revert fixes things up?
Thanks.
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Revert
: commit bb6eddf7676e1c1f3e637aa93c5224488d99036f
: Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
: AuthorDate: Thu Dec 10 15:35:10 2009 +0100
: Commit: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
: CommitDate: Fri Dec 11 10:28:08 2009 +0100
:
: clockevents: Prevent clockevent_devices list corruption on cpu hotplug
due to the regression reported in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15005
Cc: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Reported-by: Martin Bammer <mrb74@....at>
Cc: <stable@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/time/clockevents.c | 18 +++---------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff -puN kernel/time/clockevents.c~revert-clockevents-prevent-clockevent_devices-list-corruption-on-cpu-hotplug kernel/time/clockevents.c
--- a/kernel/time/clockevents.c~revert-clockevents-prevent-clockevent_devices-list-corruption-on-cpu-hotplug
+++ a/kernel/time/clockevents.c
@@ -238,9 +238,8 @@ void clockevents_exchange_device(struct
*/
void clockevents_notify(unsigned long reason, void *arg)
{
- struct clock_event_device *dev, *tmp;
+ struct list_head *node, *tmp;
unsigned long flags;
- int cpu;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&clockevents_lock, flags);
clockevents_do_notify(reason, arg);
@@ -251,19 +250,8 @@ void clockevents_notify(unsigned long re
* Unregister the clock event devices which were
* released from the users in the notify chain.
*/
- list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &clockevents_released, list)
- list_del(&dev->list);
- /*
- * Now check whether the CPU has left unused per cpu devices
- */
- cpu = *((int *)arg);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &clockevent_devices, list) {
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, dev->cpumask) &&
- cpumask_weight(dev->cpumask) == 1) {
- BUG_ON(dev->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED);
- list_del(&dev->list);
- }
- }
+ list_for_each_safe(node, tmp, &clockevents_released)
+ list_del(node);
break;
default:
break;
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists