linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mmotm-2010-01-06-14-34] check high watermark after shrink zone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100112150152.78604b78.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:01:52 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mmotm-2010-01-06-14-34] check high watermark after
 shrink zone

On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:12:35 +0900
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:

> Kswapd check that zone have enough free by zone_water_mark.
> If any zone doesn't have enough page, it set all_zones_ok to zero.
> all_zone_ok makes kswapd retry not sleeping.
> 
> I think the watermark check before shrink zone is pointless.
> Kswapd try to shrink zone then the check is meaningul.
> 
> This patch move the check after shrink zone.

The changelog is rather hard to understand.  I changed it to

: Kswapd checks that zone has sufficient pages free via zone_watermark_ok().
: 
: If any zone doesn't have enough pages, we set all_zones_ok to zero. 
: !all_zone_ok makes kswapd retry rather than sleeping.
: 
: I think the watermark check before shrink_zone() is pointless.  Only after
: kswapd has tried to shrink the zone is the check meaningful.
: 
: Move the check to after the call to shrink_zone().


> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> CC: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> CC: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c |   21 +++++++++++----------
>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 885207a..b81adf8 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2057,9 +2057,6 @@ loop_again:
>  					priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
>  				continue;
>  
> -			if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order,
> -					high_wmark_pages(zone), end_zone, 0))
> -				all_zones_ok = 0;

This will make kswapd stop doing reclaim if all zones have
zone_is_all_unreclaimable():

			if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone))
				continue;

This seems bad.

>  			temp_priority[i] = priority;
>  			sc.nr_scanned = 0;
>  			note_zone_scanning_priority(zone, priority);
> @@ -2099,13 +2096,17 @@ loop_again:
>  			    total_scanned > sc.nr_reclaimed + sc.nr_reclaimed / 2)
>  				sc.may_writepage = 1;
>  
> -			/*
> -			 * We are still under min water mark. it mean we have
> -			 * GFP_ATOMIC allocation failure risk. Hurry up!
> -			 */
> -			if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, min_wmark_pages(zone),
> -					      end_zone, 0))
> -				has_under_min_watermark_zone = 1;
> +			if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order,
> +					high_wmark_pages(zone), end_zone, 0)) {
> +				all_zones_ok = 0;
> +				/*
> +				 * We are still under min water mark. it mean we have
> +				 * GFP_ATOMIC allocation failure risk. Hurry up!
> +				 */
> +				if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, min_wmark_pages(zone),
> +						      end_zone, 0))
> +					has_under_min_watermark_zone = 1;
> +			}
>  

The vmscan.c code makes an effort to look nice in an 80-col display.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/