linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86: using logical flat for amd cpu too.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001111913570.17145@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:16:16 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
cc:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	"ananth@...ibm.com" <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86: using logical flat for amd cpu too.



On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> tested that amd support logical flat too when cpus num <= 8 and even
> bsp apic id > 8
> 
> so could remove vendor check...

At least this one makes code simpler.

What was the background for thinking that AMD didn't support the same APIC 
addressing models? If there really is some issue external to the CPU's 
themselves, whatever problem was attributed to AMD might be the same (or 
similar) problem that Ananth had.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/