[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100112035443.GI5243@nowhere>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:54:45 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/26] kprobes: Convert to raw_spinlocks
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:26:55PM +0100, John Kacur wrote:
> Convert locks which cannot be sleeping locks in preempt-rt to raw_spinlocks.
>
> See also dc23e836d8d25fe5aa4057d54dae2094fbc614f6
>
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/kprobes.h | 2 +-
> kernel/kprobes.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kprobes.h b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> index 1b672f7..620df87 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ struct kretprobe {
> int nmissed;
> size_t data_size;
> struct hlist_head free_instances;
> - spinlock_t lock;
> + raw_spinlock_t lock;
> };
Indeed, this lock seems to be taken when a probe triggers, which
can happen in about every places/context.
Please add a comment to explain this though.
(Adding Masami in Cc).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists