| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1263269692.5948.21.camel@marge.simson.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:14:52 +0100 From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1 On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 11:13 +0800, Lin Ming wrote: > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 10:33 +0800, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 09:09 +0800, Lin Ming wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 00:16 +0800, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > > I've been all through it too, same result. The below may make a bit of > > > > difference, but really has diddly spit to do with this oddity. > > > > > > I test this patch applied to 2.6.33-rc3, but no help on tbench > > > regression. > > > > Did you try it with the vmark fix also applied? I would have expected > > at least a _little_ improvement. (but then this regression _is_ a bit > > odd anyway) > > I re-tested with both patches applied, but still no help. OK, thanks. > BTW, why do you call that patch "vmark" fix? :) > I just wonder what "vmark" means. Oh, that's volanomark. It put itself in directory vmark2.5.0.9, so it's vmark ;-) -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists